The ERISA Industry Committee Files Lawsuit Against City of Seattle

Seattle Health Benefit Initiative Obstructs Federal Law

For Immediate Release

Washington, DC – The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) today filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against the City of Seattle for obstructing the federal law that enables large employers to administer health and retirement benefits uniformly across the country. ERIC is requesting an injunction and a declaration from the court that federal law supersedes and preempts the health coverage and payment mandates in Part 3 of the Seattle Hotel Employees Health and Safety Initiative – SMC 14.25 (the Initiative); ERIC hopes to work with the City and negotiate a temporary nonenforcement agreement, at least until a decision in the case is reached.

Under Part 3 of the Initiative, City hotels with at least 100 rooms must enroll employees (even if they have other coverage) in the equivalent of a gold-level medical policy on the Washington State insurance exchange at a cost of no more than five percent of their monthly gross taxable earnings or else provide additional compensation. ERIC seeks to halt enforcement of Part 3 of the Initiative because it requires, uniquely for Seattle, a specified level of health plan benefits. If that level of benefits is not provided, City hotels must pay additional compensation to hotel employees.

In its lawsuit, ERIC argues that the health benefit plans of large employers are regulated by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). ERISA contains a broad federal preemption provision that invalidates any state and local law that relates to employee benefit plans, including health benefit plans. This broad standard has consistently been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

“ERISA provides the federal framework of national uniformity that enables employers to offer health benefits to employees and their families in communities across the country. ERIC opposes efforts by the City of Seattle, or any state or locality, that attempts to mandate or impose requirements on private health or retirement plans regulated by ERISA,” said Annette Guarisco Fildes, ERIC’s president and CEO. “Almost half of all Americans receive health coverage through their employer. Federal laws are in place so that multi-state employers can provide benefits to their employees no matter where they live or work; it is important that local governments respect these laws.”

ERIC previously sued the Oregon Retirement Savings Board (ORSB) on ERISA preemption grounds over the employer-reporting requirement imposed by Oregon’s state-run mandatory retirement plan, OregonSaves. In the Oregon complaint, ERIC argued that ERISA preempts the OregonSaves reporting requirements imposed on employers that already provide an ERISA retirement plan to their Oregon employees. ERIC and the ORSB settled in March of this year.

To read ERIC’s complaint against the City of Seattle, click here.

Click here to read ERIC’s Q&A on the litigation.

About the ERISA Industry Committee
The ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) is the only national association that advocates exclusively for large employers on health, retirement, and compensation public policies at the state, federal, and local levels. Learn more at


All media inquiries to The ERISA Industry Committee should be directed to:

Kelly Broadway, 202.627.1918,

About the ERISA Industry Committee
ERIC is the only national association that advocates exclusively for large employer plan sponsors on health, retirement, compensation, and paid leave public policies at the federal, state, and local levels. With member companies that are leaders in every sector of the economy, ERIC is promoting uniformity and flexibility for nationwide benefit plans.