ERIC is pleased the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of U.S. Bank in James J. Thole v. U.S. Bank N.A. holding that the plaintiffs lacked standing since they would receive the same benefits whether they won or lost.
Topic Archives:
ERISA Victory in Thole v. US Bank
Today the Supreme Court decided Thole v. U.S. Bank in favor of the U.S. Bank holding that the plaintiffs lacked standing since they would receive the same benefits whether they won or lost.
Response Needed on Laurent v. PwC Litigation Request
Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.
Litigation Update – Seattle
Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.
New Jersey WARN Act Expansion Effective Date Delayed
Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.
Response Needed on Litigation Requests
Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.
ERIC: The Law is on Our Side in Seattle Health Mandate Lawsuit
ERIC filed a response to the City of Seattle, which had asked the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington to dismiss our amended complaint. The filing rejects the City’s assertion that its recently enacted health-benefits ordinance is not preempted by federal law and urged the Court to order that ERIC’s case continue.
ERIC Confident Court Will Reject Seattle Employer Health Care Mandate
ERIC remains confident in our lawsuit against the City of Seattle and believes that the court will reject the City’s latest filing to dismiss the lawsuit. In January, ERIC filed an amended complaint challenging Seattle’s Municipal Code (SMC) 14.28, on the grounds that ERISA preempts the new law.
Update on Jander v. Retirement Plans Committee of IBM
Sorry, but you do not have permission to view this content.
ERIC Takes Seattle Back to Court Over New Employer Health Care Mandate
ERIC has filed an amended complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington challenging Seattle’s Municipal Code 14.28, on grounds that the new law is preempted by ERISA.