TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tab
|
|
|
Outline of Hybrid Plan Research Findings
|
|
American Association of Retired Persons, Amicus Brief in Central Laborers'
Pension Fund v. Heinz, 2004 WL 425737
|
|
American Association of Retired Persons, Staying Ahead of the Curve 2003:
The AARP Working in Retirement Study (2003)
|
|
Committee for Economic Development, New Opportunities for Older Workers (1999)
|
|
Coronado & Copeland, Federal Reserve Board, Cash Balance Pension Plan Conversions
and the New Economy (2003)
|
|
Coronado & Copeland, Federal Reserve Board, Cash Balance Pension Plan Conversions
and the New Economy (2002) (different article with same name but earlier date)
|
|
Forman, University of Oklahoma, Public Pensions: Choosing Between Defined Benefit
and Defined Contribution Plans (1999)
|
Gale & Orszag, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Private Pensions:
Issues and Options (2003)
|
|
General Accounting Office, Cash Balance Plans: Implications for
Retirement Income (2000)
|
|
General Accounting Office, Private Pensions: Implications of Conversions
to Cash Balance Plans (2000)
|
|
Grassley, Chairman of Senate Select Committee on Aging, Letter to David
M. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States (Aug. 4, 2000)
|
|
Johnson & Uccello, Urban Institute, Can Cash Balance Pension Plans Improve
Retirement Security for Today's Workers? (2002)
|
|
Johnson & Uccello, Urban Institute, The Potential Effects of Cash Balance Plans on the
Distribution of Pension Wealth at Midlife (2001)
|
|
Johnson & Steuerle, Urban Institute, Promoting Work at Older Ages: The Role
of Hybrid Pension Plans in an Aging Population (2003)
|
|
Kleinman, Anandarajan & Lawrence, Fairleigh Dickinson University & New Jersey
Institute of Technology, An Analysis of the Move Toward Defined Contribution Pension Plans:
Are the Rewards Commensurate with the Risks? (1999)
|
|
Kopp & Sher, Society of Actuaries, A Benefit Value Comparison of a Cash-Balance Plan
with a Traditional Final Average Pay Defined-Benefit Plan (1998)
|
|
Mitchell & Mulvey, Pension Research Council, Wharton School, University of
Pennsylvania, Possible Implications of Mandating Choice in Corporate Defined Benefit
Plans (2003)
|
|
Purcell, Congressional Research Service, Pension Issues: Cash Balance Plans (2003)
|
|
Schieber, The Shift to Hybrid Pensions by U.S. Employers: An Empirical Analysis of
Actual Plan Conversions (2003)
|
|
Society of Actuaries & American Academy of Actuaries, Retirement Plan Preferences
Survey (2004)
|
|
U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, PWBA Needs to Improve
Oversight of Cash Balance Plan Lump Sum Distributions (2002)
|
|
Yakoboski, Employee Benefit Research Institute, Male and Female Tenure Continues
To Move in Opposite Directions (1999)
|
|
Yakoboski, Employee Benefit Research Institute, Debunking the Retirement Policy Myth:
Lifetime Jobs Never Existed for Most Workers (1998)
|
|
Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Don't Miss the Forest for the Trees, Compilation
of Data from IRS Form 5500s (2000)
|
|
The ERISA Industry Committee
1400 L Street, Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20005
202.789.1400
202.789.1120 (f)
www.eric.org
|